Studies that arrive after the decision is made
Surveys, recruiting, and traditional panels take weeks. For many decisions on the calendar, that is too long.
Market validation with synthetic people
For research, innovation, and strategy teams. Get an early reading of how different segments might react to your message, offer, or concept, and focus the next test with real people.
The cost of learning late
When a campaign, a price, or a launch has a date, waiting for the full study often arrives too late. Claviata gives an early signal with synthetic people so you can decide what is worth testing next with real people.
Surveys, recruiting, and traditional panels take weeks. For many decisions on the calendar, that is too long.
A single number does not say who responds, who hesitates, and which friction blocks adoption.
Once the money is committed, changing the message, offer, or segment costs more than seeing it earlier.
Without a clear hypothesis, the next study with real people spends time on the wrong questions.
What your team receives
Not a single chatbot
Data plan for young people with unlimited social media and a fixed price for six months.
Independent agent responsesBuilt for decisions
Keep the audience fixed, change the decision, and see what moves before you commit the spend.
Test a headline, a promise, or a call to action before you invest in media.
See which value, terms, or conditions create interest and hesitation.
Read differences inside a market before choosing whom to prioritize.
Test a stronger version again with the same audience and focus the next study better.
Who it’s for
If your calendar has a campaign, a price, or a dated launch, Claviata gives you the first reading with synthetic people before the spend is committed. It does not manage real audiences: it anticipates how different segments might react.
Arrive at a pitch or a client with routes already filtered. Speed up exploration and focus the work with real people.
Put concepts, packaging, prices, and promotions to the test before you produce, buy media, or open a launch.
Evaluate propositions, trust messages, and adoption barriers by segment before a costly rollout.
Compare plans, experiences, and campaigns, and spot reasons for hesitation or churn before you invest at scale.
How it works
Describe the message, offer, or concept and name the people whose response matters.
Claviata simulates independent responses across different contexts, budgets, and constraints.
Receive segments, reasons in favor, objections, and the next recommended test with real people.
Public evidence · Colombia
Before Fedesarrollo’s June Consumer Confidence Index was published, our synthetic estimate came in at 21.5. The observed figure was 24.3, a difference of 2.8 points. We published the method, the sample size, and the limits of the exercise.
Read the case studyHonest limits
Claviata delivers an early reading with synthetic people to focus validation and reduce the cost of exploration. It does not replace research or tests with real people. One success in an exercise does not guarantee that every decision can be estimated with the same accuracy. Readings are private by default.
For business teams
In the demo you will see how to set up a test, compare synthetic segments, and identify what is worth validating next with real people. You will leave with a concrete plan for your next campaign, offer, or launch. For teams across Latin America.
Self-serve
An option for individuals and small teams who want to try without guidance. No subscription and no expiring allowances. Each credit equals 100 responses. You know exactly what you are buying.
One-time purchases in USD. Available across Latin America.e.g. 5 credits = 500 responses.
15 credits
One deep reading and credits to test a revision.
Buy Explore · 15 credits35 credits
Recurring validations for a campaign, offer, or launch.
Buy Validate · 35 credits100 credits
Several initiatives and audiences in parallel.
Buy Scale · 100 creditsName origin
Claviata takes its name from Paraponera clavata, native to Central and South America. The idea is simple: many specialized voices, coordinated to understand a complex environment. In our case, those voices are synthetic people.